When I hear the word “Robot”, the first image that comes
into my mind is a metallic body with monotone voice saying “Hi, my friend, what
can I do for you?” But after listening to this lecture, I found that this word
really means mechanization, industrialization and mass production.
Obviously, technology plays an important role in all kinds
of artwork, such as literature, paintings and movies. The artwork will always
shows the trendiest products of scientific development and reflects on where
the inventions will lead us. My favorite scientific fiction film is I, Robot by
Will Smith. The movie shows a strong belief that the robots can achieve self-evolution
by using machine learning and can even possess emotions and dreams just like
human. At the end of the movie, I was surprised to find out the protagonist,
who hates robots, is a robot himself and he never realizes that. It was shot in
2004, and 12 years later, the artificial intelligence starts to shock the
world. Just several weeks ago, the Google artificial intelligence, AlphaGo,
beat lee Se-dol, a Go world champion, in Go, which was thought as a very
complicated game that can only be mastered by human beings.
But, of course, every coin has two sides. The mechanization
and mass production did a great job in making art accessible to the general
public. We can now stay at home and see all those famous artwork online. If we
have further interest, we can buy copies of Van Gogh, Picasso, or Monet’s
pieces and hang them on the wall. Also, the technology now allows people from
different places to communicate and even work on one piece of work. Just like
Douglas Davis stated in his article, “There is here”. However, when we appreciate
the beauty of all the copies of artwork, we feel there is something missing. In
Walter Benjamin’s article, “The Work of art in the Age of Mechanical
Reproduction”, he argues that the reproduction lacks in its presence in time
and space, it’s not original anymore. For example, there is a very special kind
of china that its glazes in different colors mix, blend and have chemical
reactions during the production process. Since this situation occurs very
rarely, people view this kind of china with very high artistic value. But now workers
master the technique to produce the “mysterious” glaze, they can decide which
color and what kind of pattern according to people’s tastes, the china is not
unique anymore, and it losses its identity.
normal china
china that has changing glaze
From industrialization, we can see that the relationship
between art and science has become closer and closer, but when we try to work with
both of them, we should not forget the initial determination that both art and science are creative and we want to make innovations.
sources:
Alamy. "I, Robot (2004)-The Best Robots in Film". The Telegraph. Web. Apr 15, 2016. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/10943616/robots-in-film.html?frame=2963515
"AlphaGo-the first computer program to ever beat a professional player at the
game of go". Google Deepmind. 2016. Web. Apr 15, 2016. https://deepmind.com/alpha-go
kongfz.com. Web. Apr 14, 2016. http://book.kongfz.com/item_pic_105897_263033767/?ref=baidu
"What is Porcelain?". wiseGEEK. Web. Apr 15, 2016. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-porcelain.htm
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London: Penguin, 2008. Print.
Davis, Douglas. “The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction.” The MIT Press, 1995. Print. Apr 16, 2016.
Rodney Brooks. "Robots will invade our lives". TED. Feb, 2003. Web. Apr 16, 2016. http://www.ted.com/talks/rodney_brooks_on_robots




Hi Simeng! I really enjoyed reading your article and loved how you talked about Chinese porcelain as an example of how technology and original artworks can conflict. I definitely agree with you that while industrialization and mechanization can bring art and science closer, they separate art from its original innovative, creative roots.
ReplyDeleteHi, I really liked how you used the example of Google's bot beating the grandmaster at Go. I was also following this series intently and didn't realize that it could be tied into this weeks topic.
ReplyDeleteI also like how you balance your post by examining both sides of the coin and specifying both pros and cons of industrialization on the world of art.